<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beat B-Boy Breakdown: Nick Schmitt on Paul Siegell’s Poemergency Room</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gentlyread.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/beat-b-boy-breakdown-nick-schmitt-on-paul-siegell%e2%80%99s-poemergency-room/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gentlyread.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/beat-b-boy-breakdown-nick-schmitt-on-paul-siegell%e2%80%99s-poemergency-room/</link>
	<description>Essays &#38; Criticism of Contemporary Poetry and Literary Fiction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 00:59:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: b-boy</title>
		<link>http://gentlyread.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/beat-b-boy-breakdown-nick-schmitt-on-paul-siegell%e2%80%99s-poemergency-room/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>b-boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gentlyread.wordpress.com/?p=816#comment-499</guid>
		<description>Paul&#039;s break dancer poem on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_fPyqTuwe0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul&#8217;s break dancer poem on YouTube: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_fPyqTuwe0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_fPyqTuwe0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: v. del gargano</title>
		<link>http://gentlyread.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/beat-b-boy-breakdown-nick-schmitt-on-paul-siegell%e2%80%99s-poemergency-room/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>v. del gargano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gentlyread.wordpress.com/?p=816#comment-305</guid>
		<description>Check out http://paulsiegell.blogspot.com/ for more on Paul Siegell&#039;s work, AND http://www.lulu.com/content/1711938 to preview the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out <a href="http://paulsiegell.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://paulsiegell.blogspot.com/</a> for more on Paul Siegell&#8217;s work, AND <a href="http://www.lulu.com/content/1711938" rel="nofollow">http://www.lulu.com/content/1711938</a> to preview the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: REL</title>
		<link>http://gentlyread.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/beat-b-boy-breakdown-nick-schmitt-on-paul-siegell%e2%80%99s-poemergency-room/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>REL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gentlyread.wordpress.com/?p=816#comment-289</guid>
		<description>Cool review on a great book, but I want to clear something up. You mention Siegell’s poem, *the chill soar*, and say, “(he) places the letters on the page as if they were pieces of roadkill spread across the highway.” Roadkill is an interesting way to look at it, but I believe what the author was trying to do in that poem was to create an actual two-direction highway. Consonants going one way, vowels the other, and to me, it seems that the letter “y” is the hawk. Just wanted to throw that out there. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool review on a great book, but I want to clear something up. You mention Siegell’s poem, *the chill soar*, and say, “(he) places the letters on the page as if they were pieces of roadkill spread across the highway.” Roadkill is an interesting way to look at it, but I believe what the author was trying to do in that poem was to create an actual two-direction highway. Consonants going one way, vowels the other, and to me, it seems that the letter “y” is the hawk. Just wanted to throw that out there. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://gentlyread.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/beat-b-boy-breakdown-nick-schmitt-on-paul-siegell%e2%80%99s-poemergency-room/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gentlyread.wordpress.com/?p=816#comment-288</guid>
		<description>INSTEAD OF: Poemerbency Room 
I meant &quot;POEMERGENCY ROOM&quot;   gee. TYPOS...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>INSTEAD OF: Poemerbency Room<br />
I meant &#8220;POEMERGENCY ROOM&#8221;   gee. TYPOS&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://gentlyread.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/beat-b-boy-breakdown-nick-schmitt-on-paul-siegell%e2%80%99s-poemergency-room/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gentlyread.wordpress.com/?p=816#comment-287</guid>
		<description>You say &quot;...it is an experiment not in replicating life but an experiment done to be clever.&quot;  

I say: what&#039;s wrong with being clever? One definition of clever is &quot;[the] showing [of] inventiveness and skill.&quot; Another definition of clever: &quot;mentally sharp or bright, witty; possessing quick or able intelligence; nimble with hands or body; ... resourceful; showing inventiveness or ORIGINALITY; possessing MAGICAL ABILITIES&quot;

To me, the lack of cleverness is what&#039;s wrong with some poetry these days.  Paul Siegell&#039;s book &quot;Poemerbency Room&quot; is original (despite your over-comparisons to Kerouac and e.e. cummings) and it possesses magical abilities, too;  I say &quot;magic&quot; because it is not a book you can easily set down off to the side once you finish reading it;  something about it keeps drawing the reader back. Take for instance the poem &quot;Poembrance the Bloom.&quot;  I read it the other day (for the umpteenth time). In this poem, he writes: &quot;all that blossoms is blessed/all that withers is wake/all that blossoms is bright/all that withers is wail...all that blossoms is brief/all that withers is witness.&quot;  

&quot;All that blossoms is brief/all that withers is witness&quot;-- just chant that to yourself. Some people have the bible, I have this poem.  This poem isn&#039;t just about the alliteration (the Bs and the Ws), but if you (the reader) are just focusing on that-- sure that&#039;s all you will take from the poem. However, a true feeler of poetry would notice the alliteration after the fact and say &quot;Wow, how did the poet manage to do that and yet not lose the poem in the process!&quot; 

This author is special and, to me, this book might just be what the doctor/sorcerer ordered for those sleeping-poets out there, and for those would-be writers who need a push.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say &#8220;&#8230;it is an experiment not in replicating life but an experiment done to be clever.&#8221;  </p>
<p>I say: what&#8217;s wrong with being clever? One definition of clever is &#8220;[the] showing [of] inventiveness and skill.&#8221; Another definition of clever: &#8220;mentally sharp or bright, witty; possessing quick or able intelligence; nimble with hands or body; &#8230; resourceful; showing inventiveness or ORIGINALITY; possessing MAGICAL ABILITIES&#8221;</p>
<p>To me, the lack of cleverness is what&#8217;s wrong with some poetry these days.  Paul Siegell&#8217;s book &#8220;Poemerbency Room&#8221; is original (despite your over-comparisons to Kerouac and e.e. cummings) and it possesses magical abilities, too;  I say &#8220;magic&#8221; because it is not a book you can easily set down off to the side once you finish reading it;  something about it keeps drawing the reader back. Take for instance the poem &#8220;Poembrance the Bloom.&#8221;  I read it the other day (for the umpteenth time). In this poem, he writes: &#8220;all that blossoms is blessed/all that withers is wake/all that blossoms is bright/all that withers is wail&#8230;all that blossoms is brief/all that withers is witness.&#8221;  </p>
<p>&#8220;All that blossoms is brief/all that withers is witness&#8221;&#8211; just chant that to yourself. Some people have the bible, I have this poem.  This poem isn&#8217;t just about the alliteration (the Bs and the Ws), but if you (the reader) are just focusing on that&#8211; sure that&#8217;s all you will take from the poem. However, a true feeler of poetry would notice the alliteration after the fact and say &#8220;Wow, how did the poet manage to do that and yet not lose the poem in the process!&#8221; </p>
<p>This author is special and, to me, this book might just be what the doctor/sorcerer ordered for those sleeping-poets out there, and for those would-be writers who need a push.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Missy</title>
		<link>http://gentlyread.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/beat-b-boy-breakdown-nick-schmitt-on-paul-siegell%e2%80%99s-poemergency-room/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Missy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gentlyread.wordpress.com/?p=816#comment-286</guid>
		<description>I agree that e.e. cummings and Paul Siegell &quot;...confront us with the fact that words and letters are works of art in themselves...,&quot; but what I disagree on is that &quot;...a reader will not find in Paul Siegell’s &quot;Poemergency Room&quot; a philosophical exploration of life, self, beauty, movement...&quot;

Siegell&#039;s poems are not just &quot;fun&quot; little whimsical poems and his poems not only &quot;[Celebrate] life,&quot; his poems _are_ life. A poet&#039;s job is to give a whole new take on life, self, beauty, movement, to give the readers his philosophy or his &quot;side of the story.&quot; If not that, then all poets would sound alike. 

And Paul Siegell gives a WHOLE NEW take on life in &quot;Poemergency Room&quot; -- that is why he is one of the fresh new voices in poetry. Some poets talk about the same thing, in the same way as everybody else, but you won&#039;t find that here, not in &quot;Poemergency Room.&quot; That is what makes it an outstanding read. 

Read it again, Paul Siegell&#039;s &quot;philosophical exploration of life, self, beauty, movement&quot; is in every page, every poem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that e.e. cummings and Paul Siegell &#8220;&#8230;confront us with the fact that words and letters are works of art in themselves&#8230;,&#8221; but what I disagree on is that &#8220;&#8230;a reader will not find in Paul Siegell’s &#8220;Poemergency Room&#8221; a philosophical exploration of life, self, beauty, movement&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Siegell&#8217;s poems are not just &#8220;fun&#8221; little whimsical poems and his poems not only &#8220;[Celebrate] life,&#8221; his poems _are_ life. A poet&#8217;s job is to give a whole new take on life, self, beauty, movement, to give the readers his philosophy or his &#8220;side of the story.&#8221; If not that, then all poets would sound alike. </p>
<p>And Paul Siegell gives a WHOLE NEW take on life in &#8220;Poemergency Room&#8221; &#8212; that is why he is one of the fresh new voices in poetry. Some poets talk about the same thing, in the same way as everybody else, but you won&#8217;t find that here, not in &#8220;Poemergency Room.&#8221; That is what makes it an outstanding read. </p>
<p>Read it again, Paul Siegell&#8217;s &#8220;philosophical exploration of life, self, beauty, movement&#8221; is in every page, every poem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
